Compare / MiniCPM5 1B vs Gemma 3 270M

MiniCPM5 1B vs Gemma 3 270M

Updated November 2026

Verdict

MiniCPM5 1B scores higher on the Small LM Index: 29.5 vs 12.8. On the 5 benchmarks both labs report, MiniCPM5 1B wins 5 and Gemma 3 270M wins 0. Both need about 1.4 GB of memory at 4-bit quantization. Neither model has a hosted API on OpenRouter, so you would run both yourself.

Pick MiniCPM5 1B if…

  • you want the strongest model overall
  • you need precise instruction following
  • you build agents that call tools
  • you work with long documents
  • you need a permissive license (Apache-2.0)
  • you want the more widely used model (more quantized builds and community support)

Pick Gemma 3 270M if…

No clear advantage in the data we have.

Specifications

MiniCPM5 1BGemma 3 270M
Small LM Index29.5 (likely 20–42)12.8 (likely 12–14)
LabOpenBMB (MiniCPM) · ChinaGoogle · United States
Released2026-05-212025-08-14
Parameters1.1B (dense)270M (dense)
Memory at 4-bit~1.4 GB~0.7 GB
Context window131K tokens32K tokens
Inputtexttext
ReasoningHybrid (thinking on/off)No thinking
LicenseApache-2.0Gemma
API price / 1M tokensSelf-host onlySelf-host only
Hugging Face downloads (30 days)257.9K60.4K

Benchmarks

Higher is better. Bold marks the winner where both labs report a score. ≈ marks the index model's estimate for a score that wasn't reported, ✓ an independent measurement and * a score measured by another lab.

BenchmarkMiniCPM5 1BGemma 3 270M
MMLU-Pro Knowledge≈ 535.5✓
GPQA Diamond Knowledge27.8✓22.4✓
Humanity's Last Exam Reasoning6.5✓3.6✓
AIME Math≈ 212.3✓
LiveCodeBench Coding≈ 210.3✓
τ²-Bench Agentic81.0✓9.1✓
IFBench Instruction following49.3✓12.1✓
AA-LCR Long context6.0✓0.0✓

Scores are mostly reported by each lab with its own settings, so small gaps are noise. See the methodology. Open in the interactive comparison to add more models.

Questions

Which is better, MiniCPM5 1B or Gemma 3 270M?

MiniCPM5 1B scores higher on the Small LM Index: 29.5 vs 12.8. On the 5 benchmarks both labs report, MiniCPM5 1B wins 5 and Gemma 3 270M wins 0.

Which is cheaper to run?

Neither model has a hosted API on OpenRouter, so you would run both yourself. Both need about 1.4 GB of memory at 4-bit quantization.

Which has the longer context window?

MiniCPM5 1B has the longer context window: 131K tokens against 32K.

Can I use MiniCPM5 1B and Gemma 3 270M commercially?

MiniCPM5 1B is released under Apache-2.0 and Gemma 3 270M under Gemma. Apache 2.0 and MIT allow commercial use; other licenses can add conditions, so read the license before shipping a product.

Related comparisons