Compare / Spark-X2.6 4B vs Gemma 3n E2B
Spark-X2.6 4B vs Gemma 3n E2B
Updated November 2026
Verdict
Spark-X2.6 4B scores higher on the Small LM Index: 67.5 vs 14.3. On the 2 benchmarks both labs report, Spark-X2.6 4B wins 2 and Gemma 3n E2B wins 0. Both need about 4 GB of memory at 4-bit quantization. Neither model has a hosted API on OpenRouter, so you would run both yourself.
Pick Spark-X2.6 4B if…
- you want the strongest model overall
- you need math and reasoning
- you work with long documents
- you need a permissive license (Apache-2.0)
Pick Gemma 3n E2B if…
- you need image input
Specifications
| Spark-X2.6 4B | Gemma 3n E2B | |
|---|---|---|
| Small LM Index | 67.5 (likely 65–70) | 14.3 (likely 12–17) |
| Lab | SparkLLM (XHToken) · China | Google · United States |
| Released | 2026-10-19 | 2025-06-26 |
| Parameters | 4.1B (dense) | 5.4B (dense) |
| Memory at 4-bit | ~3.4 GB | ~4 GB |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 32K tokens |
| Input | text | text, image, audio, video |
| Reasoning | Hybrid (thinking on/off) | No thinking |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Gemma |
| API price / 1M tokens | Self-host only | Self-host only |
| Hugging Face downloads (30 days) | 18.9K | 38.3K |
Benchmarks
Higher is better. Bold marks the winner where both labs report a score. ≈ marks the index model's estimate for a score that wasn't reported, ✓ an independent measurement and * a score measured by another lab.
| Benchmark | Spark-X2.6 4B | Gemma 3n E2B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro Knowledge | ≈ 83 | 40.5 |
| GPQA Diamond Knowledge | 77.1 | 24.8 |
| Humanity's Last Exam Reasoning | 17.9 | ≈ 1 |
| AIME Math | 91.2 | 6.7 |
| LiveCodeBench Coding | ≈ 78 | 18.6 |
| SWE-bench Verified Coding | 62.8 | ≈ 3 |
| τ²-Bench Agentic | 86.9 | — |
| IFBench Instruction following | 75.8 | — |
| MMLU Knowledge | — | 60.1 |
| Multilingual MMLU Multilingual | — | 55.1 |
| IFEval Instruction following | 93.6 | — |
| BFCL Agentic | 71.8 | — |
| HMMT Math | 81.3 | — |
| AA-LCR Long context | 67.3 | — |
| SciCode Coding | 36.8 | — |
Scores are mostly reported by each lab with its own settings, so small gaps are noise. See the methodology. Open in the interactive comparison to add more models.
Questions
Which is better, Spark-X2.6 4B or Gemma 3n E2B?
Spark-X2.6 4B scores higher on the Small LM Index: 67.5 vs 14.3. On the 2 benchmarks both labs report, Spark-X2.6 4B wins 2 and Gemma 3n E2B wins 0.
Which is cheaper to run?
Neither model has a hosted API on OpenRouter, so you would run both yourself. Both need about 4 GB of memory at 4-bit quantization.
Which has the longer context window?
Spark-X2.6 4B has the longer context window: 1M tokens against 32K.
Can I use Spark-X2.6 4B and Gemma 3n E2B commercially?
Spark-X2.6 4B is released under Apache-2.0 and Gemma 3n E2B under Gemma. Apache 2.0 and MIT allow commercial use; other licenses can add conditions, so read the license before shipping a product.
Related comparisons
- Nanbeige4.2 3B vs Spark-X2.6 4B
- Spark-X2.5 4B vs Spark-X2.6 4B
- Qwen3.5 4B vs Spark-X2.6 4B
- Qwen3 4B Thinking 2507 vs Spark-X2.6 4B
- Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 4B vs Spark-X2.6 4B
- Gemma 4 E2B vs Spark-X2.6 4B
- Gemma 3 4B vs Spark-X2.6 4B
- Gemma 3n E2B vs Gemma 4 E2B
- Gemma 3 4B vs Gemma 3n E2B
- Gemma 3n E2B vs Nanbeige4.2 3B