Compare / Ministral 3 8B vs Ling 3.0 Tiny
Ministral 3 8B vs Ling 3.0 Tiny
Updated November 2026
Verdict
Ministral 3 8B scores higher on the Small LM Index: 55.2 vs 51.9, although their likely ranges overlap, so the lead is not certain. On the 2 benchmarks both labs report, Ministral 3 8B wins 1 and Ling 3.0 Tiny wins 1. Both need about 6.7 GB of memory at 4-bit quantization. Only Ministral 3 8B has a hosted API on OpenRouter ($0.15 per million tokens); the other has to be self-hosted.
Pick Ministral 3 8B if…
- you want the strongest model overall
- you need math and reasoning
- you want a hosted API rather than running it yourself
- you work with long documents
- you need image input
Pick Ling 3.0 Tiny if…
No clear advantage in the data we have.
Specifications
| Ministral 3 8B | Ling 3.0 Tiny | |
|---|---|---|
| Small LM Index | 55.2 (likely 51–60) | 51.9 (likely 47–57) |
| Lab | Mistral AI · Europe | InclusionAI (Ling) · China |
| Released | 2025-12-02 | 2026-08-10 |
| Parameters | 8B (dense) | 7.9B (1.4B active, MoE) |
| Memory at 4-bit | ~6.7 GB | ~5.7 GB |
| Context window | 256K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Input | text, image | text |
| Reasoning | Hybrid (thinking on/off) | Hybrid (thinking on/off) |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| API price / 1M tokens | $0.15 ($0.15 in, $0.15 out) | Self-host only |
| Hugging Face downloads (30 days) | 16.3K | 14.3K |
Benchmarks
Higher is better. Bold marks the winner where both labs report a score. ≈ marks the index model's estimate for a score that wasn't reported, ✓ an independent measurement and * a score measured by another lab.
| Benchmark | Ministral 3 8B | Ling 3.0 Tiny |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro Knowledge | ≈ 76 | 65.8* |
| GPQA Diamond Knowledge | 66.8 | 73.4 |
| AIME Math | 78.7 | 73.3* |
| LiveCodeBench Coding | 61.6 | ≈ 59 |
| IFBench Instruction following | — | 60.6* |
Scores are mostly reported by each lab with its own settings, so small gaps are noise. See the methodology. Open in the interactive comparison to add more models.
Questions
Which is better, Ministral 3 8B or Ling 3.0 Tiny?
Ministral 3 8B scores higher on the Small LM Index: 55.2 vs 51.9, although their likely ranges overlap, so the lead is not certain. On the 2 benchmarks both labs report, Ministral 3 8B wins 1 and Ling 3.0 Tiny wins 1.
Which is cheaper to run?
Only Ministral 3 8B has a hosted API on OpenRouter ($0.15 per million tokens); the other has to be self-hosted. Both need about 6.7 GB of memory at 4-bit quantization.
Which has the longer context window?
Ministral 3 8B has the longer context window: 256K tokens against 131K.
Can I use Ministral 3 8B and Ling 3.0 Tiny commercially?
Ministral 3 8B is released under Apache-2.0 and Ling 3.0 Tiny under MIT. Apache 2.0 and MIT allow commercial use; other licenses can add conditions, so read the license before shipping a product.
Related comparisons
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ministral 3 8B
- Gemma 4 E4B vs Ministral 3 8B
- Llama 3.1 8B vs Ministral 3 8B
- DeepSeek-R1-0528-Qwen3-8B vs Ministral 3 8B
- Ministral 3 8B vs Qwen3 8B
- Edge0 8B-A1B (preview) vs Ministral 3 8B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Ling 3.0 Tiny
- Edge0 8B-A1B (preview) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny
- Gemma 3n E4B vs Ling 3.0 Tiny
- Ling 3.0 Tiny vs MiMo-7B-RL