Compare / Ministral 3 14B vs Mellum2.1 12B-A2.5B Thinking
Ministral 3 14B vs Mellum2.1 12B-A2.5B Thinking
Updated November 2026
Verdict
Ministral 3 14B and Mellum2.1 12B-A2.5B Thinking are roughly tied on the Small LM Index (61.6 vs 60.8). On the 3 benchmarks both labs report, Ministral 3 14B wins 2 and Mellum2.1 12B-A2.5B Thinking wins 1. Mellum2.1 12B-A2.5B Thinking is smaller: it needs about 8.3 GB of memory at 4-bit, against 10.6 GB for Ministral 3 14B. Only Ministral 3 14B has a hosted API on OpenRouter ($0.20 per million tokens); the other has to be self-hosted.
Pick Ministral 3 14B if…
- you need math and reasoning
- you want a hosted API rather than running it yourself
- you work with long documents
- you need image input
- you want the more widely used model (more quantized builds and community support)
Pick Mellum2.1 12B-A2.5B Thinking if…
- you mostly write code
- you have limited memory (about 8.3 GB at 4-bit)
Specifications
| Ministral 3 14B | Mellum2.1 12B-A2.5B Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Small LM Index | 61.6 (likely 59–64) | 60.8 (likely 58–63) |
| Lab | Mistral AI · Europe | JetBrains (Mellum) · Europe |
| Released | 2025-12-02 | 2026-09-20 |
| Parameters | 14B (dense) | 12.2B (2.5B active, MoE) |
| Memory at 4-bit | ~10.6 GB | ~8.3 GB |
| Context window | 256K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Input | text, image | text |
| Reasoning | Hybrid (thinking on/off) | Always thinks |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| API price / 1M tokens | $0.20 ($0.20 in, $0.20 out) | Self-host only |
| Hugging Face downloads (30 days) | 294.9K | 10.5K |
Benchmarks
Higher is better. Bold marks the winner where both labs report a score. ≈ marks the index model's estimate for a score that wasn't reported, ✓ an independent measurement and * a score measured by another lab.
| Benchmark | Ministral 3 14B | Mellum2.1 12B-A2.5B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond Knowledge | 71.2 | 64.6 |
| AIME Math | 85.0 | 83.3 |
| LiveCodeBench Coding | 64.6 | 82.0 |
| SWE-bench Verified Coding | ≈ 54 | 47.0 |
| Terminal-Bench Agentic | — | 17.4 |
| MMLU Knowledge | — | 87.8 |
| IFEval Instruction following | — | 90.6 |
| BFCL Agentic | — | 62.3 |
Scores are mostly reported by each lab with its own settings, so small gaps are noise. See the methodology. Open in the interactive comparison to add more models.
Questions
Which is better, Ministral 3 14B or Mellum2.1 12B-A2.5B Thinking?
Ministral 3 14B and Mellum2.1 12B-A2.5B Thinking are roughly tied on the Small LM Index (61.6 vs 60.8). On the 3 benchmarks both labs report, Ministral 3 14B wins 2 and Mellum2.1 12B-A2.5B Thinking wins 1.
Which is cheaper to run?
Only Ministral 3 14B has a hosted API on OpenRouter ($0.20 per million tokens); the other has to be self-hosted. Mellum2.1 12B-A2.5B Thinking is smaller: it needs about 8.3 GB of memory at 4-bit, against 10.6 GB for Ministral 3 14B.
Which has the longer context window?
Ministral 3 14B has the longer context window: 256K tokens against 131K.
Can I use Ministral 3 14B and Mellum2.1 12B-A2.5B Thinking commercially?
Both are released under the Apache-2.0 license. Apache 2.0 and MIT allow commercial use; other licenses can add conditions, so read the license before shipping a product.
Related comparisons
- Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker vs Ministral 3 14B
- Ministral 3 14B vs Phi-4-reasoning-plus
- Ministral 3 14B vs Phi-4
- Gemma 3 12B vs Ministral 3 14B
- Gemma 4 12B vs Ministral 3 14B
- Mellum2 12B-A2.5B Instruct vs Ministral 3 14B
- Mellum2 12B-A2.5B Instruct vs Mellum2.1 12B-A2.5B Thinking
- Gemma 3 12B vs Mellum2.1 12B-A2.5B Thinking
- Gemma 4 12B vs Mellum2.1 12B-A2.5B Thinking