Compare / Spark-X2.6 1.7B vs MiniCPM-V 4.6

Spark-X2.6 1.7B vs MiniCPM-V 4.6

Updated November 2026

Verdict

Spark-X2.6 1.7B scores higher on the Small LM Index: 52.3 vs 27.0. On the 5 benchmarks both labs report, Spark-X2.6 1.7B wins 4 and MiniCPM-V 4.6 wins 1. Both need about 1.7 GB of memory at 4-bit quantization. Neither model has a hosted API on OpenRouter, so you would run both yourself.

Pick Spark-X2.6 1.7B if…

  • you want the strongest model overall
  • you need precise instruction following
  • you work with long documents

Pick MiniCPM-V 4.6 if…

  • you build agents that call tools
  • you need image input
  • you want the more widely used model (more quantized builds and community support)

Specifications

Spark-X2.6 1.7BMiniCPM-V 4.6
Small LM Index52.3 (likely 50–55)27.0 (likely 19–39)
LabSparkLLM (XHToken) · ChinaOpenBMB (MiniCPM) · China
Released2026-10-192026-04-13
Parameters1.7B (dense)1.3B (dense)
Memory at 4-bit~1.7 GB~1.4 GB
Context window1M tokens262K tokens
Inputtexttext, image, video
ReasoningHybrid (thinking on/off)No thinking
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
API price / 1M tokensSelf-host onlySelf-host only
Hugging Face downloads (30 days)2.9K196.5K

Benchmarks

Higher is better. Bold marks the winner where both labs report a score. ≈ marks the index model's estimate for a score that wasn't reported, ✓ an independent measurement and * a score measured by another lab.

BenchmarkSpark-X2.6 1.7BMiniCPM-V 4.6
GPQA Diamond Knowledge56.130.5✓
Humanity's Last Exam Reasoning8.75.1✓
AIME Math70.1≈ 17
SWE-bench Verified Coding59.8≈ 35
τ²-Bench Agentic85.387.7✓
IFBench Instruction following65.526.7✓
IFEval Instruction following89.4—
BFCL Agentic55.2—
HMMT Math48.8—
AA-LCR Long context48.07.0✓
SciCode Coding20.1—

Scores are mostly reported by each lab with its own settings, so small gaps are noise. See the methodology. Open in the interactive comparison to add more models.

Questions

Which is better, Spark-X2.6 1.7B or MiniCPM-V 4.6?

Spark-X2.6 1.7B scores higher on the Small LM Index: 52.3 vs 27.0. On the 5 benchmarks both labs report, Spark-X2.6 1.7B wins 4 and MiniCPM-V 4.6 wins 1.

Which is cheaper to run?

Neither model has a hosted API on OpenRouter, so you would run both yourself. Both need about 1.7 GB of memory at 4-bit quantization.

Which has the longer context window?

Spark-X2.6 1.7B has the longer context window: 1M tokens against 262K.

Can I use Spark-X2.6 1.7B and MiniCPM-V 4.6 commercially?

Both are released under the Apache-2.0 license. Apache 2.0 and MIT allow commercial use; other licenses can add conditions, so read the license before shipping a product.

Related comparisons