Compare / Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B vs Sarvam 30B
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B vs Sarvam 30B
Updated November 2026
Verdict
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B and Sarvam 30B are roughly tied on the Small LM Index (62.6 vs 61.6). On the 4 benchmarks both labs report, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B wins 3 and Sarvam 30B wins 1. Both need about 20.8 GB of memory at 4-bit quantization. Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B has a hosted API on OpenRouter ($0.10 per million tokens); the other has to be self-hosted.
Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B if…
- you need math and reasoning
- you build agents that call tools
- you want a hosted API rather than running it yourself
- you work with long documents
- you want the more widely used model (more quantized builds and community support)
Pick Sarvam 30B if…
- you need a permissive license (Apache-2.0)
Specifications
| Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B | Sarvam 30B | |
|---|---|---|
| Small LM Index | 62.6 (likely 59–66) | 61.6 (likely 58–65) |
| Lab | NVIDIA · United States | Sarvam AI · Rest of Asia |
| Released | 2025-12-15 | 2026-03-03 |
| Parameters | 31.6B (3.5B active, MoE) | 32.2B (2.4B active, MoE) |
| Memory at 4-bit | ~20.3 GB | ~20.8 GB |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 131K tokens |
| Input | text | text |
| Reasoning | Hybrid (thinking on/off) | Always thinks |
| License | NVIDIA Open Model | Apache-2.0 |
| API price / 1M tokens | $0.10 ($0.060 in, $0.24 out) | Self-host only |
| Hugging Face downloads (30 days) | 1.7M | 5K |
Benchmarks
Higher is better. Bold marks the winner where both labs report a score. ≈ marks the index model's estimate for a score that wasn't reported, ✓ an independent measurement and * a score measured by another lab.
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B | Sarvam 30B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro Knowledge | 78.3 | 80.0 |
| GPQA Diamond Knowledge | 73.0 | 66.5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam Reasoning | 10.6 | ≈ 12 |
| AIME Math | 89.1 | 88.3 |
| LiveCodeBench Coding | 68.3 | ≈ 71 |
| SWE-bench Verified Coding | 38.8 | ≈ 48 |
| τ²-Bench Agentic | 49.0 | 45.7 |
| IFBench Instruction following | 71.5 | — |
| MMLU Knowledge | — | 85.1 |
| MATH-500 Math | — | 97.0 |
| HMMT Math | — | 73.3 |
Scores are mostly reported by each lab with its own settings, so small gaps are noise. See the methodology. Open in the interactive comparison to add more models.
Questions
Which is better, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B or Sarvam 30B?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B and Sarvam 30B are roughly tied on the Small LM Index (62.6 vs 61.6). On the 4 benchmarks both labs report, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B wins 3 and Sarvam 30B wins 1.
Which is cheaper to run?
Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B has a hosted API on OpenRouter ($0.10 per million tokens); the other has to be self-hosted. Both need about 20.8 GB of memory at 4-bit quantization.
Which has the longer context window?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B has the longer context window: 1M tokens against 131K.
Can I use Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B and Sarvam 30B commercially?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B is released under NVIDIA Open Model and Sarvam 30B under Apache-2.0. Apache 2.0 and MIT allow commercial use; other licenses can add conditions, so read the license before shipping a product.
Related comparisons
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
- EXAONE 4.0 32B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B vs OLMo 3.1 32B Think
- Nanbeige4.3 33B vs Sarvam 30B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning vs Sarvam 30B
- EXAONE 4.0 32B vs Sarvam 30B
- OLMo 3.1 32B Think vs Sarvam 30B
- Qwen3 32B vs Sarvam 30B
- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B vs Sarvam 30B