Compare / Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
Updated November 2026
Verdict
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B scores higher on the Small LM Index: 73.4 vs 63.1, although their likely ranges overlap, so the lead is not certain. On the 5 benchmarks both labs report, Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B wins 5 and Qwen3-Coder-Next wins 0. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B is smaller: it needs about 46.9 GB of memory at 4-bit, against 50.6 GB for Qwen3-Coder-Next. Only Qwen3-Coder-Next has a hosted API on OpenRouter ($0.29 per million tokens); the other has to be self-hosted.
Pick Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B if…
- you want the strongest model overall
- you mostly write code
- you build agents that call tools
- you have limited memory (about 46.9 GB at 4-bit)
- you need image input
Pick Qwen3-Coder-Next if…
- you want a hosted API rather than running it yourself
- you need a permissive license (Apache-2.0)
- you want the more widely used model (more quantized builds and community support)
Specifications
| Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B | Qwen3-Coder-Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Small LM Index | 73.4 (likely 69–78) | 63.1 (likely 54–70) |
| Lab | NVIDIA · United States | Alibaba (Qwen) · China |
| Released | 2026-10-12 | 2026-01-30 |
| Parameters | 74B (9B active, MoE) | 79.7B (3B active, MoE) |
| Memory at 4-bit | ~46.9 GB | ~50.6 GB |
| Context window | 262K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Input | text, image | text |
| Reasoning | Hybrid (thinking on/off) | No thinking |
| License | OpenMDW-1.1 | Apache-2.0 |
| API price / 1M tokens | Self-host only | $0.29 ($0.12 in, $0.80 out) |
| Hugging Face downloads (30 days) | 7.9K | 430.1K |
Benchmarks
Higher is better. Bold marks the winner where both labs report a score. ≈ marks the index model's estimate for a score that wasn't reported, ✓ an independent measurement and * a score measured by another lab.
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B | Qwen3-Coder-Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond Knowledge | 88.8 | 73.7✓ |
| Humanity's Last Exam Reasoning | 24.7✓ | 10.1✓ |
| SWE-bench Verified Coding | ≈ 65 | 70.6 |
| Terminal-Bench Agentic | 53.9 | 36.2 |
| τ²-Bench Agentic | — | 79.5✓ |
| IFBench Instruction following | — | 35.2✓ |
| AA-LCR Long context | 69.7✓ | 47.0✓ |
| SciCode Coding | 39.7✓ | 36.2✓ |
Scores are mostly reported by each lab with its own settings, so small gaps are noise. See the methodology. Open in the interactive comparison to add more models.
Questions
Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B or Qwen3-Coder-Next?
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B scores higher on the Small LM Index: 73.4 vs 63.1, although their likely ranges overlap, so the lead is not certain. On the 5 benchmarks both labs report, Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B wins 5 and Qwen3-Coder-Next wins 0.
Which is cheaper to run?
Only Qwen3-Coder-Next has a hosted API on OpenRouter ($0.29 per million tokens); the other has to be self-hosted. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B is smaller: it needs about 46.9 GB of memory at 4-bit, against 50.6 GB for Qwen3-Coder-Next.
Which has the longer context window?
Both have a 262K-token context window.
Can I use Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B and Qwen3-Coder-Next commercially?
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B is released under OpenMDW-1.1 and Qwen3-Coder-Next under Apache-2.0. Apache 2.0 and MIT allow commercial use; other licenses can add conditions, so read the license before shipping a product.
Related comparisons
- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B
- Llama 3.3 70B vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B
- K2-V2 Instruct vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Thinking
- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-70B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next