Compare / Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next

Updated November 2026

Verdict

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B scores higher on the Small LM Index: 73.4 vs 63.1, although their likely ranges overlap, so the lead is not certain. On the 5 benchmarks both labs report, Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B wins 5 and Qwen3-Coder-Next wins 0. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B is smaller: it needs about 46.9 GB of memory at 4-bit, against 50.6 GB for Qwen3-Coder-Next. Only Qwen3-Coder-Next has a hosted API on OpenRouter ($0.29 per million tokens); the other has to be self-hosted.

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B if…

  • you want the strongest model overall
  • you mostly write code
  • you build agents that call tools
  • you have limited memory (about 46.9 GB at 4-bit)
  • you need image input

Pick Qwen3-Coder-Next if…

  • you want a hosted API rather than running it yourself
  • you need a permissive license (Apache-2.0)
  • you want the more widely used model (more quantized builds and community support)

Specifications

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9BQwen3-Coder-Next
Small LM Index73.4 (likely 69–78)63.1 (likely 54–70)
LabNVIDIA · United StatesAlibaba (Qwen) · China
Released2026-10-122026-01-30
Parameters74B (9B active, MoE)79.7B (3B active, MoE)
Memory at 4-bit~46.9 GB~50.6 GB
Context window262K tokens262K tokens
Inputtext, imagetext
ReasoningHybrid (thinking on/off)No thinking
LicenseOpenMDW-1.1Apache-2.0
API price / 1M tokensSelf-host only$0.29 ($0.12 in, $0.80 out)
Hugging Face downloads (30 days)7.9K430.1K

Benchmarks

Higher is better. Bold marks the winner where both labs report a score. ≈ marks the index model's estimate for a score that wasn't reported, ✓ an independent measurement and * a score measured by another lab.

BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9BQwen3-Coder-Next
GPQA Diamond Knowledge88.873.7✓
Humanity's Last Exam Reasoning24.7✓10.1✓
SWE-bench Verified Coding≈ 6570.6
Terminal-Bench Agentic53.936.2
τ²-Bench Agentic—79.5✓
IFBench Instruction following—35.2✓
AA-LCR Long context69.7✓47.0✓
SciCode Coding39.7✓36.2✓

Scores are mostly reported by each lab with its own settings, so small gaps are noise. See the methodology. Open in the interactive comparison to add more models.

Questions

Which is better, Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B or Qwen3-Coder-Next?

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B scores higher on the Small LM Index: 73.4 vs 63.1, although their likely ranges overlap, so the lead is not certain. On the 5 benchmarks both labs report, Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B wins 5 and Qwen3-Coder-Next wins 0.

Which is cheaper to run?

Only Qwen3-Coder-Next has a hosted API on OpenRouter ($0.29 per million tokens); the other has to be self-hosted. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B is smaller: it needs about 46.9 GB of memory at 4-bit, against 50.6 GB for Qwen3-Coder-Next.

Which has the longer context window?

Both have a 262K-token context window.

Can I use Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B and Qwen3-Coder-Next commercially?

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B is released under OpenMDW-1.1 and Qwen3-Coder-Next under Apache-2.0. Apache 2.0 and MIT allow commercial use; other licenses can add conditions, so read the license before shipping a product.

Related comparisons

Guides featuring these models