Compare / Step3-VL-10B vs Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Step3-VL-10B vs Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Updated November 2026

Verdict

Step3-VL-10B and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 are roughly tied on the Small LM Index (53.2 vs 52.9). On the 5 benchmarks both labs report, Step3-VL-10B wins 3 and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 wins 2. Both need about 8 GB of memory at 4-bit quantization. Neither model has a hosted API on OpenRouter, so you would run both yourself.

Pick Step3-VL-10B if…

  • you need precise instruction following
  • you need a permissive license (Apache-2.0)
  • you need image input

Pick Nemotron Nano 9B v2 if…

  • you build agents that call tools
  • you work with long documents
  • you want the more widely used model (more quantized builds and community support)

Specifications

Step3-VL-10BNemotron Nano 9B v2
Small LM Index53.2 (likely 40–64)52.9 (likely 50–56)
LabStepFun · ChinaNVIDIA · United States
Released2026-012025-08-18
Parameters10B (dense)8.9B (dense)
Memory at 4-bit~8 GB~6.2 GB
Context window64K tokens128K tokens
Inputtext, imagetext
ReasoningAlways thinksHybrid (thinking on/off)
LicenseApache-2.0NVIDIA Open Model
API price / 1M tokensSelf-host onlySelf-host only
Hugging Face downloads (30 days)—133.7K

Benchmarks

Higher is better. Bold marks the winner where both labs report a score. ≈ marks the index model's estimate for a score that wasn't reported, ✓ an independent measurement and * a score measured by another lab.

BenchmarkStep3-VL-10BNemotron Nano 9B v2
MMLU-Pro Knowledge≈ 7374.2✓
GPQA Diamond Knowledge69.0✓57.0✓
Humanity's Last Exam Reasoning10.8✓4.9✓
AIME Math≈ 7069.7✓
LiveCodeBench Coding≈ 5672.4✓
τ²-Bench Agentic16.1✓21.9✓
IFBench Instruction following50.2✓27.6✓
AA-LCR Long context0.0✓22.7✓

Scores are mostly reported by each lab with its own settings, so small gaps are noise. See the methodology. Open in the interactive comparison to add more models.

Questions

Which is better, Step3-VL-10B or Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

Step3-VL-10B and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 are roughly tied on the Small LM Index (53.2 vs 52.9). On the 5 benchmarks both labs report, Step3-VL-10B wins 3 and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 wins 2.

Which is cheaper to run?

Neither model has a hosted API on OpenRouter, so you would run both yourself. Both need about 8 GB of memory at 4-bit quantization.

Which has the longer context window?

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 has the longer context window: 128K tokens against 64K.

Can I use Step3-VL-10B and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 commercially?

Step3-VL-10B is released under Apache-2.0 and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 under NVIDIA Open Model. Apache 2.0 and MIT allow commercial use; other licenses can add conditions, so read the license before shipping a product.

Related comparisons