Compare / Phi-4-reasoning-plus vs Phi-4

Phi-4-reasoning-plus vs Phi-4

Updated November 2026

Verdict

Phi-4-reasoning-plus scores higher on the Small LM Index: 54.4 vs 44.7, although their likely ranges overlap, so the lead is not certain. On the 2 benchmarks both labs report, Phi-4-reasoning-plus wins 2 and Phi-4 wins 0. Both need about 11.4 GB of memory at 4-bit quantization. Only Phi-4 has a hosted API on OpenRouter ($0.070 per million tokens); the other has to be self-hosted.

Pick Phi-4-reasoning-plus if…

  • you want the strongest model overall
  • you work with long documents

Pick Phi-4 if…

  • you want a hosted API rather than running it yourself
  • you want the more widely used model (more quantized builds and community support)

Specifications

Phi-4-reasoning-plusPhi-4
Small LM Index54.4 (likely 50–59)44.7 (likely 35–55)
LabMicrosoft (Phi) · United StatesMicrosoft (Phi) · United States
Released2025-04-302024-12-12
Parameters14.7B (dense)14.7B (dense)
Memory at 4-bit~11.4 GB~11.4 GB
Context window32K tokens16K tokens
Inputtexttext
ReasoningAlways thinksNo thinking
LicenseMITMIT
API price / 1M tokensSelf-host only$0.070 ($0.056 in, $0.11 out)
Hugging Face downloads (30 days)4.9K327K

Benchmarks

Higher is better. Bold marks the winner where both labs report a score. ≈ marks the index model's estimate for a score that wasn't reported, ✓ an independent measurement and * a score measured by another lab.

BenchmarkPhi-4-reasoning-plusPhi-4
MMLU-Pro Knowledge76.070.4
GPQA Diamond Knowledge69.356.1
AIME Math78.0≈ 61
LiveCodeBench Coding53.1≈ 50

Scores are mostly reported by each lab with its own settings, so small gaps are noise. See the methodology. Open in the interactive comparison to add more models.

Questions

Which is better, Phi-4-reasoning-plus or Phi-4?

Phi-4-reasoning-plus scores higher on the Small LM Index: 54.4 vs 44.7, although their likely ranges overlap, so the lead is not certain. On the 2 benchmarks both labs report, Phi-4-reasoning-plus wins 2 and Phi-4 wins 0.

Which is cheaper to run?

Only Phi-4 has a hosted API on OpenRouter ($0.070 per million tokens); the other has to be self-hosted. Both need about 11.4 GB of memory at 4-bit quantization.

Which has the longer context window?

Phi-4-reasoning-plus has the longer context window: 32K tokens against 16K.

Can I use Phi-4-reasoning-plus and Phi-4 commercially?

Both are released under the MIT license. Apache 2.0 and MIT allow commercial use; other licenses can add conditions, so read the license before shipping a product.

Related comparisons