Compare / Phi-4-reasoning-plus vs Phi-4
Phi-4-reasoning-plus vs Phi-4
Updated November 2026
Verdict
Phi-4-reasoning-plus scores higher on the Small LM Index: 54.4 vs 44.7, although their likely ranges overlap, so the lead is not certain. On the 2 benchmarks both labs report, Phi-4-reasoning-plus wins 2 and Phi-4 wins 0. Both need about 11.4 GB of memory at 4-bit quantization. Only Phi-4 has a hosted API on OpenRouter ($0.070 per million tokens); the other has to be self-hosted.
Pick Phi-4-reasoning-plus if…
- you want the strongest model overall
- you work with long documents
Pick Phi-4 if…
- you want a hosted API rather than running it yourself
- you want the more widely used model (more quantized builds and community support)
Specifications
| Phi-4-reasoning-plus | Phi-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Small LM Index | 54.4 (likely 50–59) | 44.7 (likely 35–55) |
| Lab | Microsoft (Phi) · United States | Microsoft (Phi) · United States |
| Released | 2025-04-30 | 2024-12-12 |
| Parameters | 14.7B (dense) | 14.7B (dense) |
| Memory at 4-bit | ~11.4 GB | ~11.4 GB |
| Context window | 32K tokens | 16K tokens |
| Input | text | text |
| Reasoning | Always thinks | No thinking |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| API price / 1M tokens | Self-host only | $0.070 ($0.056 in, $0.11 out) |
| Hugging Face downloads (30 days) | 4.9K | 327K |
Benchmarks
Higher is better. Bold marks the winner where both labs report a score. ≈ marks the index model's estimate for a score that wasn't reported, ✓ an independent measurement and * a score measured by another lab.
| Benchmark | Phi-4-reasoning-plus | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro Knowledge | 76.0 | 70.4 |
| GPQA Diamond Knowledge | 69.3 | 56.1 |
| AIME Math | 78.0 | ≈ 61 |
| LiveCodeBench Coding | 53.1 | ≈ 50 |
Scores are mostly reported by each lab with its own settings, so small gaps are noise. See the methodology. Open in the interactive comparison to add more models.
Questions
Which is better, Phi-4-reasoning-plus or Phi-4?
Phi-4-reasoning-plus scores higher on the Small LM Index: 54.4 vs 44.7, although their likely ranges overlap, so the lead is not certain. On the 2 benchmarks both labs report, Phi-4-reasoning-plus wins 2 and Phi-4 wins 0.
Which is cheaper to run?
Only Phi-4 has a hosted API on OpenRouter ($0.070 per million tokens); the other has to be self-hosted. Both need about 11.4 GB of memory at 4-bit quantization.
Which has the longer context window?
Phi-4-reasoning-plus has the longer context window: 32K tokens against 16K.
Can I use Phi-4-reasoning-plus and Phi-4 commercially?
Both are released under the MIT license. Apache 2.0 and MIT allow commercial use; other licenses can add conditions, so read the license before shipping a product.
Related comparisons
- Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker vs Phi-4-reasoning-plus
- Ministral 3 14B vs Phi-4-reasoning-plus
- Gemma 4 12B vs Phi-4-reasoning-plus
- LLaDA2.2 mini vs Phi-4-reasoning-plus
- Gemma 3 12B vs Phi-4-reasoning-plus
- Apriel 1.6 15B Thinker vs Phi-4
- Ministral 3 14B vs Phi-4
- Gemma 4 12B vs Phi-4
- LLaDA2.2 mini vs Phi-4
- Gemma 3 12B vs Phi-4